BBEM vs FTGS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs First Trust Growth Strength ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | FTGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $748M | $1.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 0.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +15.82% | +12.49% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.69% | +14.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.42% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -20.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Oct 25, 2022 |
BBEM vs FTGS Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% while FTGS returned +14.75%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.82% versus a gain of 12.49% for FTGS.
Over three years, BBEM compounded at +19.42% per year against +18.25% for FTGS. Across the full 3-year window we track, FTGS has the edge at +19.84% annualized vs +19.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for FTGS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -20.0% for FTGS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while FTGS charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $60 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 0.09% for FTGS.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and FTGS share 1 holdings out of 938 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBEM | Weight in FTGS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMI | 0.06% | 2.08% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or FTGS?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FTGS charges 0.60%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or FTGS?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% vs +14.75% for FTGS, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBEM annualized +19.55% vs +19.84% for FTGS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or FTGS?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for FTGS. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs FTGS -20.0%.
Should I hold both BBEM and FTGS?
BBEM and FTGS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and FTGS?
BBEM and FTGS share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 938 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or FTGS?
BBEM yields 2.52% while FTGS yields 0.09%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.