BBEM vs PATN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | PATN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $748M | $194M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.59% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 106 | |
| YTD Return | +15.60% | +28.99% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.87% | +52.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.02% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Sep 16, 2024 |
BBEM vs PATN Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year BBEM returned +32.87% while PATN returned +52.00%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.60% versus a gain of 28.99% for PATN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 15.1% for BBEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -16.8% for PATN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while PATN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $65 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 1.59% for PATN.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and PATN share 17 holdings out of 973 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or PATN?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while PATN charges 0.65%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or PATN?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.87% vs +52.00% for PATN, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BBEM annualized +19.41% vs +37.50% for PATN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or PATN?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 15.1% for BBEM. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs PATN -16.8%.
Should I hold both BBEM and PATN?
BBEM and PATN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and PATN?
BBEM and PATN share 17 common holdings with a 11.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 973 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or PATN?
BBEM yields 2.52% while PATN yields 1.59%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.