BBEM vs VGI
BBEM vs VGI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | VGI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 1.74% | |
| AUM | $748M | $88M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 11.98% | |
| Holdings | 1,132 | 646 | |
| YTD Return | +15.82% | +1.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.69% | +5.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.42% | +11.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +2.10% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -63.3% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Virtus Investment Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | Feb 23, 2012 |
BBEM vs VGI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund (VGI) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% while VGI returned +5.12%. Year to date, BBEM is up 15.82% versus a gain of 1.47% for VGI.
Over three years, BBEM compounded at +19.42% per year against +11.60% for VGI. Across the full 3-year window we track, BBEM has the edge at +19.55% annualized vs -2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.2% for VGI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -63.3% for VGI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while VGI charges 1.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $174 annually, a gap of $159 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 2.52% against 11.98% for VGI.
Holdings Overlap
BBEM and VGI share 0 holdings out of 1323 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or VGI?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VGI charges 1.74%. BBEM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $159 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBEM or VGI?
Over the past year BBEM returned +32.69% vs +5.12% for VGI, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBEM annualized +19.55% vs -2.38% for VGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBEM or VGI?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VGI. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs VGI -63.3%.
Should I hold both BBEM and VGI?
BBEM and VGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBEM and VGI?
BBEM and VGI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1323 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or VGI?
BBEM yields 2.52% while VGI yields 11.98%, so VGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.