BBLB vs SCHD
BBLB vs SCHD
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
BBLB has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBLB | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $32M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.79% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -4.02% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.85% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.40% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BBLB vs SCHD Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BBLB returned -2.85% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, BBLB is down 4.02% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, BBLB compounded at -1.40% per year against +15.08% for SCHD. Across the full 3-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs -3.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 13.3% for BBLB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for BBLB and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBLB charges 0.04% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $6 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBLB currently yields 4.79% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BBLB and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 139 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBLB or SCHD?
BBLB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while SCHD charges 0.06%. BBLB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBLB or SCHD?
Over the past year BBLB returned -2.85% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBLB annualized -3.50% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBLB or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 13.3% for BBLB. Worst drawdown: BBLB -21.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BBLB and SCHD?
BBLB and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBLB and SCHD?
BBLB and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 139 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBLB or SCHD?
BBLB yields 4.79% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so BBLB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.