BBLB vs VYM

BBLB vs VYM

Which is better, BBLB or VYM?

VYM has been ahead.

VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBLBVYM
Expense Ratio0.04%Tie0.04%Tie
AUM$33M$81.6B
Dividend Yield5.01%2.22%
Holdings42613
YTD Return-5.23%+12.29%Best
1Y Return-7.10%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-0.85%+17.42%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.12%
Volatility (annualized)13.1%11.5%Best
Max Drawdown-21.1%-14.5%Best
$10,000 over 3.4 years$8,781$16,399Best
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Value
InceptionApr 19, 2023Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 24, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.4 years).

BBLB vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.

BBLB vs VYM Performance

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBLB returned -7.10% while VYM returned +16.61%. Year to date, BBLB is down 5.23% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.

Over three years, BBLB compounded at -0.85% per year against +17.42% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BBLB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 11.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for BBLB and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BBLB charges 0.04% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $4 annually. On income, BBLB currently yields 5.01% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 37 holdings in BBLB and 557 in VYM, totalling 85.8% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in BBLB and 557 in VYM, against full books of 42 and 613.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BBLB and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BBLBVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BBLB or VYM?

BBLB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VYM charges 0.04%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, BBLB or VYM?

Over the past year BBLB returned -7.10% vs +16.61% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BBLB or VYM?

BBLB has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 11.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BBLB -21.1% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both BBLB and VYM?

BBLB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BBLB or VYM?

BBLB yields 5.01% while VYM yields 2.22%, so BBLB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than BBLB?

VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.