BBLB vs VYM
BBLB vs VYM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBLB | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $32M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.79% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -4.02% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.85% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.40% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BBLB vs VYM Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBLB returned -2.85% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, BBLB is down 4.02% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, BBLB compounded at -1.40% per year against +18.25% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -3.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.3% for BBLB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for BBLB and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBLB charges 0.04% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $4 annually. On income, BBLB currently yields 4.79% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BBLB and VYM share 0 holdings out of 597 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBLB or VYM?
BBLB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VYM charges 0.04%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBLB or VYM?
Over the past year BBLB returned -2.85% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBLB annualized -3.50% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBLB or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.3% for BBLB. Worst drawdown: BBLB -21.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BBLB and VYM?
BBLB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBLB and VYM?
BBLB and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 597 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBLB or VYM?
BBLB yields 4.79% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BBLB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.