BBSB vs IVV
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBSB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $55M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.95% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 93 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.25% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.58% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.91% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BBSB vs IVV Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BBSB returned +1.58% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, BBSB is down 0.25% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, BBSB compounded at +3.91% per year against +21.47% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.6% for BBSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for BBSB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBSB charges 0.04% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBSB currently yields 3.95% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BBSB and IVV share 0 holdings out of 582 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBSB or IVV?
BBSB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBSB or IVV?
Over the past year BBSB returned +1.58% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBSB annualized +3.43% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBSB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.6% for BBSB. Worst drawdown: BBSB -1.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BBSB and IVV?
BBSB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBSB and IVV?
BBSB and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 582 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBSB or IVV?
BBSB yields 3.95% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BBSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.