BBSB vs VXUS
BBSB vs VXUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
BBSB has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBSB | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $55M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.95% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 93 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.24% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.56% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.81% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BBSB vs VXUS Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBSB returned +1.56% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BBSB is down 0.24% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BBSB compounded at +3.81% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.6% for BBSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for BBSB and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBSB charges 0.04% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $5 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBSB currently yields 3.95% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BBSB and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7938 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBSB or VXUS?
BBSB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VXUS charges 0.05%. BBSB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBSB or VXUS?
Over the past year BBSB returned +1.56% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BBSB annualized +3.45% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBSB or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.6% for BBSB. Worst drawdown: BBSB -1.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BBSB and VXUS?
BBSB and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBSB and VXUS?
BBSB and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7938 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBSB or VXUS?
BBSB yields 3.95% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BBSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.