BBYY vs QQQ
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBYY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $673,664.36 | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 107.87% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -25.90% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BBYY vs QQQ Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BBYY is down 25.90% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for BBYY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBYY charges 1.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $18 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBYY currently yields 107.87% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBYY or QQQ?
BBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBYY or QQQ?
BBYY yields 107.87% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.