BBYY vs VXUS
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, BBYY or VXUS?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBYY | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $577,852.11 | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 129.98% | 2.38% |
| Holdings | 15 | 9,293 |
| YTD Return | -29.94% | +8.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | -28.89% | +12.87%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.94% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.11% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.2% | -11.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $6,814 | $11,491Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2025 to Nov 10, 2026 (1.1 years).
BBYY vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
BBYY vs VXUS Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBYY returned -28.89% while VXUS returned +12.87%. Year to date, BBYY is down 29.94% versus a gain of 8.79% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 14.6% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for BBYY and -11.3% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.06. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBYY charges 1.07% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $5 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBYY currently yields 129.98% against 2.38% for VXUS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBYY and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBYY or VXUS?
BBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBYY or VXUS?
Over the past year BBYY returned -28.89% vs +12.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BBYY annualized -29.44% vs +13.47% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBYY or VXUS?
BBYY has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BBYY -33.2% vs VXUS -11.3%.
Should I hold both BBYY and VXUS?
BBYY and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.06, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBYY or VXUS?
BBYY yields 129.98% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so BBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than BBYY?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.