BBYY vs VOO
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBYY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $673,664.36 | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 107.87% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -22.80% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BBYY vs VOO Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BBYY is down 22.80% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for BBYY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBYY charges 1.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBYY currently yields 107.87% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBYY or VOO?
BBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBYY or VOO?
BBYY yields 107.87% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.