BCOR vs IVV
Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCOR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.60% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -16.69% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | -31.92% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BCOR vs IVV Performance
Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) is a ETF from Grayscale and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BCOR returned -31.92% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, BCOR is down 16.69% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.0% for BCOR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCOR charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCOR currently yields 3.60% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BCOR and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCOR or IVV?
BCOR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCOR or IVV?
Over the past year BCOR returned -31.92% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCOR annualized -8.33% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCOR or IVV?
BCOR has been the more volatile fund at 37.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BCOR -43.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BCOR and IVV?
BCOR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCOR and IVV?
BCOR and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCOR or IVV?
BCOR yields 3.60% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BCOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.