BESF vs QQQ
Bastion Energy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BESF delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BESF | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $34M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.85% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 21 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.33% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +62.30% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | EA Series Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BESF vs QQQ Performance
Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) is a ETF from EA Series Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BESF returned +62.30% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, BESF is up 17.33% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.3% for BESF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for BESF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BESF charges 0.80% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $18 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BESF currently yields 5.85% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BESF and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 123 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BESF | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FANG | 4.02% | 0.23% | 3.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BESF or QQQ?
BESF has an expense ratio of 0.80% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BESF or QQQ?
Over the past year BESF returned +62.30% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so BESF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BESF annualized +55.91% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BESF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.3% for BESF. Worst drawdown: BESF -11.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BESF and QQQ?
BESF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BESF and QQQ?
BESF and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 123 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BESF or QQQ?
BESF yields 5.85% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BESF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.