BESF vs IVV
Bastion Energy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BESF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BESF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $34M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.85% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 21 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +17.96% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +62.91% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | EA Series Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BESF vs IVV Performance
Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) is a ETF from EA Series Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BESF returned +62.91% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, BESF is up 17.96% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BESF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for BESF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BESF charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BESF currently yields 5.85% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BESF and IVV share 7 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BESF or IVV?
BESF has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BESF or IVV?
Over the past year BESF returned +62.91% vs +20.94% for IVV, so BESF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BESF annualized +56.76% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BESF or IVV?
BESF has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BESF -11.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BESF and IVV?
BESF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BESF and IVV?
BESF and IVV share 7 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BESF or IVV?
BESF yields 5.85% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BESF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.