BESO vs IVV
GSR Crypto Core3 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BESO or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BESO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +23.73%Best | +11.51% |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.66% |
| Fund Family | GSR Strategies, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 21, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BESO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BESO vs IVV Performance
GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) is an ETF from GSR Strategies, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BESO is up 23.73% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BESO charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BESO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in BESO and 490 in IVV, totalling 100.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in BESO and 490 in IVV, against full books of 4 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 4 and 490 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions BESO does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BESO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BESO or IVV?
BESO has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BESO or IVV?
BESO yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BESO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.