BESO vs QQQ
GSR Crypto Core3 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BESO or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BESO | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 4 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +29.85%Best | +15.94% |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.26% |
| Fund Family | GSR Strategies, LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 21, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BESO vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BESO vs QQQ Performance
GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) is an ETF from GSR Strategies, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BESO is up 29.85% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BESO charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BESO currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in BESO and 102 in QQQ, totalling 100.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in BESO and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 4 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 4 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 96 positions BESO does not, 97.5% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, MU 4.43%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BESO and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BESO or QQQ?
BESO has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BESO or QQQ?
BESO yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BESO?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.