BGCG vs VTI
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BGCG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGCG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $105M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 29 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +6.90% | +14.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BGCG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BGCG vs VTI Performance
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF (BGCG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BGCG is up 6.90% versus a gain of 14.43% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGCG charges 0.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGCG currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
9.8% of BGCG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.4% of VTI's money is in holdings BGCG also owns.
BGCG and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, BGCG as of Sep 17, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BGCG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 29 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BGCG (91.0% of the fund), and 9 for BGCG that do not appear in VTI (33.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGCG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGCG or VTI?
BGCG has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BGCG and VTI?
9.8% of BGCG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.4% of VTI's is in holdings BGCG also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BGCG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGCG or VTI?
BGCG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BGCG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.