BGCG vs QQQ
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BGCG or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGCG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $105M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 29 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +7.38% | +22.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.53% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.67% |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.3% | 47.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BGCG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BGCG vs QQQ Performance
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF (BGCG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BGCG is up 7.38% versus a gain of 22.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGCG charges 0.72% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $18 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGCG currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
24.5% of BGCG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 10.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings BGCG also owns.
BGCG and QQQ share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BGCG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 29 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BGCG (88.7% of the fund), and 8 for BGCG that do not appear in QQQ (27.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
24.5% of BGCG is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGCG or QQQ?
BGCG has an expense ratio of 0.72% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BGCG and QQQ?
24.5% of BGCG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 10.5% of QQQ's is in holdings BGCG also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BGCG and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGCG or QQQ?
BGCG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BGCG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.