BGCG vs VYM
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BGCG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGCG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $109M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 29 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +4.74% | +11.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.0% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BGCG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BGCG vs VYM Performance
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF (BGCG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BGCG is up 4.74% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGCG charges 0.72% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $4 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGCG currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in BGCG and 557 in VYM, totalling 99.0% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BGCG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 29 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BGCG (97.1% of the fund), and 8 for BGCG that do not appear in VYM (32.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGCG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGCG or VYM?
BGCG has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGCG or VYM?
BGCG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BGCG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.