BGH vs IVV
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGH | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.88% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $298M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.44% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 248 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.30% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.49% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.34% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.85% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Barings | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
BGH vs IVV Performance
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) is a ETF from Barings and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BGH returned -0.49% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, BGH is up 0.30% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, BGH compounded at +13.34% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.85% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.8% for BGH and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGH charges 3.88% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $388 vs $3 annually, a gap of $385 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGH currently yields 11.44% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BGH and IVV share 0 holdings out of 612 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGH or IVV?
BGH has an expense ratio of 3.88% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $385 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGH or IVV?
Over the past year BGH returned -0.49% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), BGH annualized -0.16% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGH or IVV?
BGH has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BGH -63.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BGH and IVV?
BGH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGH and IVV?
BGH and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 612 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGH or IVV?
BGH yields 11.44% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BGH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.