BGH vs VTI
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.88% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $298M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.44% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 248 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.09% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.39% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.25% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.80% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Barings | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
BGH vs VTI Performance
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) is a ETF from Barings and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGH returned -0.39% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, BGH is up 0.09% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, BGH compounded at +13.25% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.80% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.8% for BGH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGH charges 3.88% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $388 vs $3 annually, a gap of $385 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGH currently yields 11.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BGH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2890 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGH or VTI?
BGH has an expense ratio of 3.88% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $385 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGH or VTI?
Over the past year BGH returned -0.39% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), BGH annualized -0.18% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGH or VTI?
BGH has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BGH -63.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BGH and VTI?
BGH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGH and VTI?
BGH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2890 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGH or VTI?
BGH yields 11.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BGH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.