BGH vs VYM
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGH | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.88% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $298M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.44% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 248 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +0.65% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.14% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.53% | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.87% | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Barings | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BGH vs VYM Performance
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) is a ETF from Barings and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGH returned -0.14% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, BGH is up 0.65% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Over three years, BGH compounded at +13.53% per year against +18.29% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.87% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.08% annualized vs -0.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.8% for BGH and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGH charges 3.88% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $388 vs $4 annually, a gap of $384 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGH currently yields 11.44% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BGH and VYM share 0 holdings out of 665 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGH or VYM?
BGH has an expense ratio of 3.88% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $384 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGH or VYM?
Over the past year BGH returned -0.14% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), BGH annualized -0.14% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGH or VYM?
BGH has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BGH -63.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BGH and VYM?
BGH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGH and VYM?
BGH and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 665 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGH or VYM?
BGH yields 11.44% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BGH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.