BGY vs IVV
BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGY | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $592M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.06% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 127 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.29% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.65% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.46% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.75% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 25, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
BGY vs IVV Performance
BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust (BGY) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BGY returned +12.65% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, BGY is up 5.29% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, BGY compounded at +13.46% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.75% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.9% for BGY and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGY charges 0.99% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGY currently yields 8.06% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BGY and IVV share 1 holdings out of 552 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGY | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE | 0.98% | 0.55% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGY or IVV?
BGY has an expense ratio of 0.99% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGY or IVV?
Over the past year BGY returned +12.65% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BGY annualized -4.03% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGY or IVV?
BGY has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BGY -80.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BGY and IVV?
BGY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGY and IVV?
BGY and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 552 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGY or IVV?
BGY yields 8.06% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.