BJUN vs SPY
BJUN vs SPY
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - June vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BJUN | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $314M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +6.52% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.33% | +23.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.86% | +21.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.51% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 31, 2019 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BJUN vs SPY Performance
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BJUN returned +12.33% while SPY returned +23.66%. Year to date, BJUN is up 6.52% versus a gain of 13.79% for SPY.
Over three years, BJUN compounded at +13.86% per year against +21.40% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +8.51% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BJUN has the edge at +9.87% annualized vs +8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.2% for BJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for BJUN and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BJUN charges 0.79% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $9 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJUN currently yields 0.00% against 1.01% for SPY.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BJUN or SPY?
BJUN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BJUN or SPY?
Over the past year BJUN returned +12.33% vs +23.66% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BJUN annualized +9.87% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BJUN or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.2% for BJUN. Worst drawdown: BJUN -22.7% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BJUN and SPY?
BJUN and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, BJUN or SPY?
BJUN yields 0.00% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.