BJUN vs VTI

BJUN vs VTI

Which is better, BJUN or VTI?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBJUNVTI
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$259M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings123,543
YTD Return+5.82%+12.28%Best
1Y Return+8.94%+16.78%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+13.72%+20.89%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.34%+11.94%Best
Volatility (annualized)10.2%Best16.8%
Max Drawdown-22.7%Best-35.0%
$10,000 over 5 years$14,926$17,576Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 31, 2019May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2019 to Sep 17, 2026 (7.3 years).

BJUN vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.

BJUN vs VTI Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BJUN returned +8.94% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, BJUN is up 5.82% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.

Over three years, BJUN compounded at +13.72% per year against +20.89% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.34% and +11.94% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +15.64% annualized vs +9.61%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 10.2% for BJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for BJUN and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BJUN charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJUN currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BJUN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BJUNVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BJUN or VTI?

BJUN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BJUN or VTI?

Over the past year BJUN returned +8.94% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BJUN annualized +9.61% vs +15.64% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BJUN or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 10.2% for BJUN. Worst drawdown: BJUN -22.7% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both BJUN and VTI?

BJUN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BJUN or VTI?

BJUN yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than BJUN?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.