BKCH vs IVV
Global X Blockchain ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCH | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $219M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.62% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -10.26% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.67% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.25% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.89% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 80.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
BKCH vs IVV Performance
Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BKCH returned +14.67% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, BKCH is down 10.26% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, BKCH compounded at +30.25% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -8.89% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 80.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.8% for BKCH and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCH charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCH currently yields 1.62% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCH or IVV?
BKCH has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKCH or IVV?
Over the past year BKCH returned +14.67% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BKCH annualized -4.12% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKCH or IVV?
BKCH has been the more volatile fund at 80.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BKCH -91.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BKCH and IVV?
BKCH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCH and IVV?
BKCH and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCH or IVV?
BKCH yields 1.62% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BKCH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.