BKCH vs VTI
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BKCH or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BKCH led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $299M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 36 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -1.02% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -19.42% | +15.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +48.79%Best | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.42% | +12.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 79.4% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -91.8% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,403 | $17,869Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2021 to Oct 1, 2026 (5.2 years).
BKCH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
BKCH vs VTI Performance
Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKCH returned -19.42% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, BKCH is down 1.02% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, BKCH compounded at +48.79% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -3.42% and +12.31% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 79.4% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.8% for BKCH and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCH charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCH currently yields 1.75% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
74.9% of BKCH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings BKCH also owns.
Most of BKCH is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, BKCH as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
18 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in BKCH and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 36 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,139 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BKCH (97.3% of the fund), and 4 for BKCH that do not appear in VTI (5.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKCH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| COINCoinbase Globa-A | 12.48% | 0.04% | 12.44% |
| CRCLCircle Internet Group In | 11.62% | 0.01% | 11.61% |
| BMNRBitmine Immersion Technologi | 9.77% | 0.01% | 9.76% |
| V71Hut 8 Corp | 5.18% | 0.02% | 5.16% |
| GLXYGalaxy Digital Inc Class A | 4.68% | 0.01% | 4.67% |
| RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc. | 4.29% | 0.01% | 4.28% |
| MARAMarathon Patent Group Inc. | 4.26% | 0.01% | 4.25% |
| CLSKCleanspark Inc | 4.00% | 0.00% | 4.00% |
| APLDApplied Digital Corp | 3.88% | 0.01% | 3.87% |
| WULFTerawulf Inc | 3.82% | 0.01% | 3.81% |
74.9% of BKCH is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCH or VTI?
BKCH has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKCH or VTI?
Over the past year BKCH returned -19.42% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKCH or VTI?
BKCH has been the more volatile fund at 79.4% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BKCH -91.8% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both BKCH and VTI?
BKCH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCH and VTI?
74.9% of BKCH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings BKCH also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in BKCH and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCH or VTI?
BKCH yields 1.75% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BKCH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BKCH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BKCH led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.