BKCH vs VTI
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $219M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.62% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -7.29% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.35% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.63% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.60% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 80.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
BKCH vs VTI Performance
Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKCH returned +16.35% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, BKCH is down 7.29% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, BKCH compounded at +31.63% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -7.60% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -3.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 80.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.8% for BKCH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCH charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCH currently yields 1.62% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BKCH and VTI share 5 holdings out of 2804 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCH or VTI?
BKCH has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKCH or VTI?
Over the past year BKCH returned +16.35% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BKCH annualized -3.50% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKCH or VTI?
BKCH has been the more volatile fund at 80.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BKCH -91.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BKCH and VTI?
BKCH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCH and VTI?
BKCH and VTI share 5 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2804 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCH or VTI?
BKCH yields 1.62% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BKCH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.