BKCH vs VXUS
Global X Blockchain ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCH | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $219M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.62% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -10.26% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.67% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.25% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.89% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 80.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BKCH vs VXUS Performance
Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKCH returned +14.67% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, BKCH is down 10.26% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, BKCH compounded at +30.25% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -8.89% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 80.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.8% for BKCH and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCH charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCH currently yields 1.62% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BKCH and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7885 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCH or VXUS?
BKCH has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKCH or VXUS?
Over the past year BKCH returned +14.67% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BKCH annualized -4.12% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKCH or VXUS?
BKCH has been the more volatile fund at 80.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BKCH -91.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BKCH and VXUS?
BKCH and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCH and VXUS?
BKCH and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7885 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCH or VXUS?
BKCH yields 1.62% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.