BKMI vs IVV
BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BKMI or IVV?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKMI | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.7B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 537 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.36% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BKMI vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BKMI vs IVV Performance
BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BKMI is down 2.36% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKMI charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKMI currently yields 1.58% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 116 holdings in BKMI and 490 in IVV, totalling 29.9% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 116 positions we hold weights for in BKMI and 490 in IVV, against full books of 537 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKMI and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKMI or IVV?
BKMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKMI or IVV?
BKMI yields 1.58% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BKMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BKMI?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.