BKMI vs QQQ
BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BKMI or QQQ?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKMI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1.7B | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 537 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -2.36% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BKMI vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BKMI vs QQQ Performance
BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BKMI is down 2.36% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKMI charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKMI currently yields 1.58% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 116 holdings in BKMI and 102 in QQQ, totalling 29.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 116 positions we hold weights for in BKMI and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 537 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKMI and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKMI or QQQ?
BKMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKMI or QQQ?
BKMI yields 1.58% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BKMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BKMI?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.