BMN vs VXUS
BMN vs VXUS
BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.17% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $156M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.32% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 170 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.05% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.50% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.58% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BMN vs VXUS Performance
BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BMN returned +9.50% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BMN is up 0.05% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BMN compounded at +5.58% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.5% for BMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.0% for BMN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMN charges 2.17% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $217 vs $5 annually, a gap of $212 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMN currently yields 4.32% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BMN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7924 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMN or VXUS?
BMN has an expense ratio of 2.17% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $212 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BMN or VXUS?
Over the past year BMN returned +9.50% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BMN annualized +4.66% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BMN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.5% for BMN. Worst drawdown: BMN -13.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BMN and VXUS?
BMN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BMN and VXUS?
BMN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7924 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMN or VXUS?
BMN yields 4.32% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.