BMNG vs IVV
Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BMNG or IVV?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMNG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -65.91% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | -91.81% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BMNG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BMNG vs IVV Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BMNG returned -91.81% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, BMNG is down 65.91% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMNG charges 0.78% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMNG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in BMNG and 490 in IVV, totalling 4.2% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in BMNG and 490 in IVV, against full books of 7 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BMNG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMNG or IVV?
BMNG has an expense ratio of 0.78% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BMNG or IVV?
Over the past year BMNG returned -91.81% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMNG or IVV?
BMNG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BMNG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.