BMNG vs VTI

BMNG vs VTI

Which is better, BMNG or VTI?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBMNGVTI
Expense Ratio0.78%0.03%Best
AUM$26M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings143,542
YTD Return-83.64%+12.23%Best
1Y Return-92.21%+12.74%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.44%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.83%
Volatility (annualized)160.9%12.6%Best
Max Drawdown-97.3%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1 years$446$11,168Best
Fund FamilyLeverage SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 27, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1 years).

BMNG vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.

BMNG vs VTI Performance

Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BMNG returned -92.21% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, BMNG is down 83.64% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BMNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 160.9% compared with 12.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.3% for BMNG and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BMNG charges 0.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMNG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BMNG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BMNGVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BMNG or VTI?

BMNG has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BMNG or VTI?

Over the past year BMNG returned -92.21% vs +12.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BMNG annualized -95.54% vs +11.68% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BMNG or VTI?

BMNG has been the more volatile fund at 160.9% annualized versus 12.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BMNG -97.3% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both BMNG and VTI?

BMNG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BMNG or VTI?

BMNG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than BMNG?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.