BMNG vs VYM

BMNG vs VYM

Which is better, BMNG or VYM?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns (1Y): VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBMNGVYM
Expense Ratio0.78%0.04%Best
AUM$55M$83.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings14608
YTD Return-64.62%+9.22%Best
1Y Return-91.50%+12.81%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.21%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.39%
Volatility (annualized)164.1%11.2%Best
Fund FamilyLeverage SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 27, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

BMNG vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BMNG vs VYM Performance

Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BMNG returned -91.50% while VYM returned +12.81%. Year to date, BMNG is down 64.62% versus a gain of 9.22% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BMNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 164.1% compared with 11.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BMNG charges 0.78% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $4 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMNG currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in BMNG and 557 in VYM, totalling 4.2% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, BMNG as of Sep 15, 2026 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in BMNG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 14 and 608.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BMNG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BMNGVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BMNG or VYM?

BMNG has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $74 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BMNG or VYM?

Over the past year BMNG returned -91.50% vs +12.81% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BMNG or VYM?

BMNG has been the more volatile fund at 164.1% annualized versus 11.2% for VYM.

Should I hold both BMNG and VYM?

BMNG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BMNG or VYM?

BMNG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than BMNG?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.