BMVP vs VXUS
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMVP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $104M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.79% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +11.32% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.87% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.21% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.31% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 1, 2003 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BMVP vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BMVP returned +14.87% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BMVP is up 11.32% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BMVP compounded at +13.21% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.31% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, BMVP has the edge at +7.63% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BMVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.4% for BMVP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMVP charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMVP currently yields 1.79% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BMVP and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7916 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BMVP | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR | 1.37% | 0.00% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMVP or VXUS?
BMVP has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BMVP or VXUS?
Over the past year BMVP returned +14.87% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BMVP annualized +7.63% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BMVP or VXUS?
BMVP has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BMVP -53.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BMVP and VXUS?
BMVP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BMVP and VXUS?
BMVP and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7916 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMVP or VXUS?
BMVP yields 1.79% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.