BMVP vs QQQ
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BMVP or QQQ?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BMVP is less concentrated, with 21.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BMVP | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $100M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 117 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +8.28% | +24.32%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.81% | +25.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.64% | +28.30%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.57% | +16.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 18.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.4%Best | -53.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,403 | $21,766Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.5%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 1, 2003 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 14, 2003 to Oct 6, 2026 (22.9 years).
BMVP vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.9 years both funds cover.
BMVP vs QQQ Performance
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BMVP returned +9.81% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, BMVP is up 8.28% versus a gain of 24.32% for QQQ.
Over three years, BMVP compounded at +14.64% per year against +28.30% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.57% and +16.83% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +14.55% annualized vs +7.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.6% for BMVP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.4% for BMVP and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BMVP charges 0.29% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $18 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMVP currently yields 1.69% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
17.8% of BMVP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 24.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings BMVP also owns.
QQQ and BMVP share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in BMVP and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 117 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 86 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BMVP (73.3% of the fund), and 45 for BMVP that do not appear in QQQ (80.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BMVP | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.88% | 8.45% | 6.57% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.97% | 7.80% | 5.83% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.63% | 3.15% | 1.52% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.64% | 1.95% | 0.31% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.95% | 0.79% | 1.16% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 1.75% | 0.83% | 0.92% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 1.74% | 0.50% | 1.24% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 1.87% | 0.33% | 1.54% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 1.77% | 0.40% | 1.37% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc | 1.55% | 0.28% | 1.27% |
24.5% of QQQ is already inside BMVP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BMVP or QQQ?
BMVP has an expense ratio of 0.29% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BMVP or QQQ?
Over the past year BMVP returned +9.81% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), BMVP annualized +7.44% vs +14.55% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BMVP or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.6% for BMVP. Worst drawdown: BMVP -53.4% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both BMVP and QQQ?
BMVP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BMVP and QQQ?
24.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings BMVP also owns. 24.5% of QQQ's is in holdings BMVP also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in BMVP and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BMVP or QQQ?
BMVP yields 1.69% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BMVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BMVP?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BMVP is less concentrated, with 21.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.