BND vs VONG
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
BND has a lower expense ratio. VONG delivered stronger 1-year returns. BND offers more diversification with 10790 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BND | VONG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $159.8B | $44.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.94% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 17,528 | 390 | |
| YTD Return | -0.53% | +5.03% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.89% | +11.57% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.22% | +22.20% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.29% | +12.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -32.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2007 | Sep 20, 2010 |
BND vs VONG Performance
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BND returned +1.89% while VONG returned +11.57%. Year to date, BND is down 0.53% versus a gain of 5.03% for VONG.
Over three years, BND compounded at +4.22% per year against +22.20% for VONG; over five years the annualized figures are -0.29% and +12.72% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.73% annualized vs +0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VONG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 4.6% for BND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for BND and -32.7% for VONG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BND charges 0.03% per year while VONG charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BND currently yields 3.94% against 0.54% for VONG.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BND or VONG?
BND has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VONG charges 0.06%. BND is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BND or VONG?
Over the past year BND returned +1.89% vs +11.57% for VONG, so VONG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BND annualized +0.67% vs +15.73% for VONG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BND or VONG?
VONG has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 4.6% for BND. Worst drawdown: BND -19.6% vs VONG -32.7%.
Should I hold both BND and VONG?
BND and VONG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BND and VONG?
BND and VONG share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 11174 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BND or VONG?
BND yields 3.94% while VONG yields 0.54%, so BND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.