BND vs XLV
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF vs State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, BND or XLV?
Intermediate Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
BND has a lower expense ratio. XLV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BND | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $160.9B | $44.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.04% | 1.49% |
| Holdings | 17,437 | 63 |
| YTD Return | -0.95% | +9.61%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.01% | +25.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.31% | +10.80%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.51% | +6.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6%Best | -40.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,748 | $13,901Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Intermediate Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2007 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 10, 2007 to Sep 21, 2026 (19.4 years).
BND vs XLV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BND vs XLV Performance
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year BND returned +0.01% while XLV returned +25.29%. Year to date, BND is down 0.95% versus a gain of 9.61% for XLV.
Over three years, BND compounded at +4.31% per year against +10.80% for XLV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.51% and +6.81% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, XLV has the edge at +8.98% annualized vs +0.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 4.6% for BND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for BND and -40.6% for XLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BND charges 0.03% per year while XLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $8 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BND currently yields 4.04% against 1.49% for XLV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 16 holdings in BND and 61 in XLV, totalling 1.5% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 16 positions we hold weights for in BND and 61 in XLV, against full books of 17,437 and 63.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BND and XLV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BND or XLV?
BND has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLV charges 0.08%. BND is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BND or XLV?
Over the past year BND returned +0.01% vs +25.29% for XLV, so XLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BND annualized +0.65% vs +8.98% for XLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BND or XLV?
XLV has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 4.6% for BND. Worst drawdown: BND -19.6% vs XLV -40.6%.
Should I hold both BND and XLV?
BND and XLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BND or XLV?
BND yields 4.04% while XLV yields 1.49%, so BND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLV better than BND?
BND has a lower expense ratio. XLV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.