VTI vs XLV
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, VTI or XLV?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XLV over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $44.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.49% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +11.65%Best | +7.44% |
| 1Y Return | +17.34% | +22.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.35%Best | +9.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.72%Best | +6.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -40.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,404Best | $13,490 |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 10, 2026 (25.3 years).
VTI vs XLV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
VTI vs XLV Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VTI returned +17.34% while XLV returned +22.74%. Year to date, VTI is up 11.65% versus a gain of 7.44% for XLV.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +20.35% per year against +9.43% for XLV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.72% and +6.17% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.01% annualized vs +7.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.0% for XLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -40.6% for XLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $8 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 1.49% for XLV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.6% of XLV's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of XLV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
56 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 61 in XLV, against full books of 3,543 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 2,787 and 61 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 626 positions XLV does not, 82.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.32%, AAPL 5.84%, MSFT 3.81%, AMZN 3.17%, GOOGL 2.88%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in XLV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.40% | 15.68% | 14.28% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 0.84% | 10.43% | 9.59% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.61% | 7.26% | 6.65% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc. | 0.52% | 6.18% | 5.66% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.44% | 5.31% | 4.87% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.27% | 3.71% | 3.44% |
| TMOThermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 0.26% | 3.69% | 3.43% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.22% | 3.14% | 2.92% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 0.22% | 2.76% | 2.54% |
| PFEPfizer, Inc. | 0.19% | 2.55% | 2.36% |
98.6% of XLV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XLV?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLV charges 0.08%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or XLV?
Over the past year VTI returned +17.34% vs +22.74% for XLV, so XLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), VTI annualized +8.01% vs +7.38% for XLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or XLV?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.0% for XLV. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XLV -40.6%.
Should I hold both VTI and XLV?
VTI and XLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XLV?
At least 98.6% of XLV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 56 positions in common, counted across the 2,787 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 61 in XLV.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XLV?
VTI yields 1.03% while XLV yields 1.49%, so XLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLV better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XLV over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.