BOTZ vs VYM
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOTZ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3.2B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +2.15% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.06% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.49% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.56% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BOTZ vs VYM Performance
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BOTZ returned +13.06% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, BOTZ is up 2.15% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, BOTZ compounded at +12.49% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +1.56% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, BOTZ has the edge at +10.02% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.5% for BOTZ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOTZ charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOTZ currently yields 0.47% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BOTZ and VYM share 0 holdings out of 619 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOTZ or VYM?
BOTZ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOTZ or VYM?
Over the past year BOTZ returned +13.06% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BOTZ annualized +10.02% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOTZ or VYM?
BOTZ has been the more volatile fund at 24.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BOTZ -55.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BOTZ and VYM?
BOTZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOTZ and VYM?
BOTZ and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 619 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOTZ or VYM?
BOTZ yields 0.47% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.