BOTZ vs VXUS
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOTZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -4.20% | +13.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.06% | +25.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.12% | +19.76% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.93% | +8.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BOTZ vs VXUS Performance
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BOTZ returned +6.06% while VXUS returned +25.90%. Year to date, BOTZ is down 4.20% versus a gain of 13.91% for VXUS.
Over three years, BOTZ compounded at +10.12% per year against +19.76% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -0.93% and +8.82% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, BOTZ has the edge at +9.26% annualized vs +4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.5% for BOTZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOTZ charges 0.68% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $5 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOTZ currently yields 0.49% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BOTZ and VXUS share 29 holdings out of 8126 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOTZ or VXUS?
BOTZ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOTZ or VXUS?
Over the past year BOTZ returned +6.06% vs +25.90% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BOTZ annualized +9.26% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOTZ or VXUS?
BOTZ has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BOTZ -55.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BOTZ and VXUS?
BOTZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOTZ and VXUS?
BOTZ and VXUS share 29 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8126 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOTZ or VXUS?
BOTZ yields 0.49% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.