BOTZ vs VTI

BOTZ vs VTI

Which is better, BOTZ or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.9%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBOTZVTI
Expense Ratio0.68%0.03%Best
AUM$3.4B$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.49%1.03%
Holdings673,543
YTD Return-1.86%+14.05%Best
1Y Return+0.62%+16.93%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+13.88%+22.65%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-1.18%+12.46%Best
Volatility (annualized)24.3%15.8%Best
Max Drawdown-55.5%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,424$17,988Best
Top 10 Weight59.9%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 12, 2016May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2016 to Sep 22, 2026 (10 years).

BOTZ vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.

BOTZ vs VTI Performance

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BOTZ returned +0.62% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, BOTZ is down 1.86% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.

Over three years, BOTZ compounded at +13.88% per year against +22.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.18% and +12.46% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.18% annualized vs +9.47%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BOTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.5% for BOTZ and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BOTZ charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOTZ currently yields 0.49% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

BOTZ already in VTI31.8%
VTI already in BOTZ10.8%

31.8% of BOTZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.8% of VTI's money is in holdings BOTZ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

17 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in BOTZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 67 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,141 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BOTZ (86.7% of the fund), and 2 for BOTZ that do not appear in VTI (1.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BOTZWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp9.63%6.40%3.23%
ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc.6.04%0.17%5.87%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.26%2.90%0.64%
TSLATesla Inc1.78%1.22%0.56%
CGNXCognex Corp - Common2.27%0.02%2.25%
AURAurora Innovation Inc2.04%0.01%2.03%
PATHUipath Inc Series D-11.90%0.01%1.89%
AVAVAerovironment Inc1.64%0.01%1.63%
JBTMJbt Marel Corp1.38%0.01%1.37%
SYMSymbotic Inc Class A1.09%0.00%1.09%

31.8% of BOTZ is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BOTZVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BOTZ or VTI?

BOTZ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BOTZ or VTI?

Over the past year BOTZ returned +0.62% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BOTZ annualized +9.47% vs +14.18% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BOTZ or VTI?

BOTZ has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BOTZ -55.5% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both BOTZ and VTI?

BOTZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BOTZ and VTI?

31.8% of BOTZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.8% of VTI's is in holdings BOTZ also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in BOTZ and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, BOTZ or VTI?

BOTZ yields 0.49% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than BOTZ?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.