BRKC vs QQQ
YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRKC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $11M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 20.64% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.71% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.10% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BRKC vs QQQ Performance
YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BRKC returned -2.10% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, BRKC is down 0.71% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.4% for BRKC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.7% for BRKC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRKC charges 0.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $18 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRKC currently yields 20.64% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BRKC and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRKC or QQQ?
BRKC has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BRKC or QQQ?
Over the past year BRKC returned -2.10% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BRKC annualized -1.80% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BRKC or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.4% for BRKC. Worst drawdown: BRKC -7.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BRKC and QQQ?
BRKC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BRKC and QQQ?
BRKC and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRKC or QQQ?
BRKC yields 20.64% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BRKC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.