BRKC vs VTI
YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRKC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 18.68% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.44% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.28% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
BRKC vs VTI Performance
YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BRKC returned +2.28% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, BRKC is up 1.44% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.2% for BRKC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.7% for BRKC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRKC charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRKC currently yields 18.68% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BRKC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRKC or VTI?
BRKC has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BRKC or VTI?
Over the past year BRKC returned +2.28% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BRKC annualized -0.04% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BRKC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.2% for BRKC. Worst drawdown: BRKC -7.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BRKC and VTI?
BRKC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BRKC and VTI?
BRKC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRKC or VTI?
BRKC yields 18.68% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BRKC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.