BSCS vs IVV

BSCS vs IVV

Which is better, BSCS or IVV?

Long Term Mid Quality against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSCSIVV
Expense Ratio0.10%0.03%Best
AUM$3.5B$876.4B
Dividend Yield4.44%1.06%
Holdings474508
YTD Return+1.04%+11.03%Best
1Y Return+2.24%+15.62%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+5.73%+20.81%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+1.13%+12.61%Best
Volatility (annualized)6.5%Best16.8%
Max Drawdown-18.4%Best-33.9%
$10,000 over 5 years$10,578$18,109Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleLong Term Mid QualityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 9, 2018May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 9, 2018 to Sep 16, 2026 (8.1 years).

BSCS vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.1 years both funds cover.

BSCS vs IVV Performance

Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSCS returned +2.24% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, BSCS is up 1.04% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.

Over three years, BSCS compounded at +5.73% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.13% and +12.61% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.79% annualized vs +2.68%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 6.5% for BSCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for BSCS and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSCS charges 0.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCS currently yields 4.44% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in BSCS0.1%

At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings BSCS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for BSCS, our book for it covers 86.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.

1 positions in common, counted across the 420 positions we hold weights for in BSCS and 490 in IVV, against full books of 474 and 508.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BSCSWeight in IVVDifference
PYPLPaypay Holdings, Inc.0.15%0.07%0.08%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BSCS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BSCSIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSCS or IVV?

BSCS has an expense ratio of 0.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BSCS or IVV?

Over the past year BSCS returned +2.24% vs +15.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BSCS annualized +2.68% vs +13.79% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BSCS or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 6.5% for BSCS. Worst drawdown: BSCS -18.4% vs IVV -33.9%.

Should I hold both BSCS and IVV?

BSCS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSCS or IVV?

BSCS yields 4.44% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BSCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BSCS?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.