BSCW vs SPY
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCW | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.82% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 319 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +0.09% | +13.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.82% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.07% | +21.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 8, 2022 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BSCW vs SPY Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BSCW returned +2.82% while SPY returned +21.53%. Year to date, BSCW is up 0.09% versus a gain of 13.68% for SPY.
Over three years, BSCW compounded at +6.07% per year against +21.44% for SPY. Across the full 4-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.85% annualized vs +5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.7% for BSCW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for BSCW and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCW charges 0.10% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $9 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCW currently yields 4.82% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
BSCW and SPY share 1 holdings out of 794 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSCW | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCW or SPY?
BSCW has an expense ratio of 0.10% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSCW or SPY?
Over the past year BSCW returned +2.82% vs +21.53% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BSCW annualized +5.25% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSCW or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.7% for BSCW. Worst drawdown: BSCW -8.3% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BSCW and SPY?
BSCW and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCW and SPY?
BSCW and SPY share 1 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCW or SPY?
BSCW yields 4.82% while SPY yields 1.01%, so BSCW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.