BSCX vs VXUS
BSCX vs VXUS
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCX | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.88% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 283 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.13% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.66% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.93% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BSCX vs VXUS Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSCX returned +2.66% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BSCX is down 0.13% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BSCX compounded at +6.93% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, BSCX has the edge at +6.93% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.7% for BSCX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.7% for BSCX and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCX charges 0.10% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $5 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCX currently yields 4.88% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BSCX and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8093 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCX or VXUS?
BSCX has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSCX or VXUS?
Over the past year BSCX returned +2.66% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSCX annualized +6.93% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSCX or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.7% for BSCX. Worst drawdown: BSCX -4.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BSCX and VXUS?
BSCX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCX and VXUS?
BSCX and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8093 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCX or VXUS?
BSCX yields 4.88% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BSCX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.