BSJR vs QQQ
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $890M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.59% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.32% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.24% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.91% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.49% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BSJR vs QQQ Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSJR returned +4.24% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, BSJR is up 2.32% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, BSJR compounded at +7.91% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.49% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.8% for BSJR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for BSJR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJR charges 0.42% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $18 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJR currently yields 5.59% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BSJR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 191 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJR or QQQ?
BSJR has an expense ratio of 0.42% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSJR or QQQ?
Over the past year BSJR returned +4.24% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BSJR annualized +3.09% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSJR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.8% for BSJR. Worst drawdown: BSJR -23.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BSJR and QQQ?
BSJR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJR and QQQ?
BSJR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 191 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJR or QQQ?
BSJR yields 5.59% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BSJR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.