BSMZ vs IVV
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BSMZ or IVV?
Long Term Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSMZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $64M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,271 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.85% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.83% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.4%Best | 13.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 17, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BSMZ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BSMZ vs IVV Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSMZ returned -0.83% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, BSMZ is down 2.85% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 5.4% for BSMZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSMZ charges 0.18% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSMZ currently yields 3.13% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 266 holdings in BSMZ and 505 in IVV, totalling 20.6% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 266 positions we hold weights for in BSMZ and 505 in IVV, against full books of 1,271 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSMZ and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSMZ or IVV?
BSMZ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSMZ or IVV?
Over the past year BSMZ returned -0.83% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSMZ or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 5.4% for BSMZ.
Should I hold both BSMZ and IVV?
BSMZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSMZ or IVV?
BSMZ yields 3.13% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BSMZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BSMZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.