BSMZ vs SCHD
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, BSMZ or SCHD?
Long Term Municipal Bond against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSMZ | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $64M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 1,271 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -3.24% | +24.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.22% | +28.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.5%Best | 13.4% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Municipal Bond | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 17, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BSMZ vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BSMZ vs SCHD Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BSMZ returned -1.22% while SCHD returned +28.14%. Year to date, BSMZ is down 3.24% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 5.5% for BSMZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSMZ charges 0.18% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $6 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSMZ currently yields 3.13% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 266 holdings in BSMZ and 100 in SCHD, totalling 20.6% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 266 positions we hold weights for in BSMZ and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 1,271 and 103.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSMZ and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSMZ or SCHD?
BSMZ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSMZ or SCHD?
Over the past year BSMZ returned -1.22% vs +28.14% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSMZ or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 5.5% for BSMZ.
Should I hold both BSMZ and SCHD?
BSMZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSMZ or SCHD?
BSMZ yields 3.13% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so BSMZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than BSMZ?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.