BSTZ vs IVV
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BSTZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSTZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.3B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.94% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 75 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +38.92% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +63.71% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.58% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.58% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
BSTZ vs IVV Performance
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSTZ returned +63.71% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, BSTZ is up 38.92% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, BSTZ compounded at +34.58% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.58% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BSTZ has the edge at +15.00% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.3% for BSTZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSTZ charges 1.05% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSTZ currently yields 7.94% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BSTZ and IVV share 14 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSTZ or IVV?
BSTZ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSTZ or IVV?
Over the past year BSTZ returned +63.71% vs +21.89% for IVV, so BSTZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BSTZ annualized +15.00% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSTZ or IVV?
BSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 28.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BSTZ -59.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BSTZ and IVV?
BSTZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSTZ and IVV?
BSTZ and IVV share 14 common holdings with a 12.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSTZ or IVV?
BSTZ yields 7.94% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BSTZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.